Legal Opinion

Samsky v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 26, 2019No. B293885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

*519This appeal challenges the superior court's denial of appellant's motion for costs of proof after respondent denied eight of his requests for admission (RFAs). Appellant Aaron Samsky prevailed at the arbitration of the parties' dispute, and then moved for an award of costs of proving matters State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) denied in the RFAs. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420, subdivisions (a) and (b),1 the trial court denied the motion, incorrectly placing on appellant the burden to prove that none of the exceptions to an award of costs as set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. GoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Cembrook v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Smith v. Circle P Ranch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Garcia v. Hyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spahn v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Vines v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API