Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1938No. 8361PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*535HANEY, Circuit Judge.
The prior decision herein (9 Cir., 94 F.2d Í.38, certiorari denied 58 S.Ct. 1045, 82 L.Ed. 1539, May 23, 1938) sets forth the facts and nature of the proceeding. At that time we made an order enforcing the order of the Board, except that part requiring back pay. Supplemental orders regarding back pay as suggested in our opinion have been made by the Board, and their enforcement is now sought.
On May 3, 1935, 263 of respondent’s employees went on strike. On June 25, 1935, respondent discharged the employees on strike. On July 5, 1935, the National Labor Relations Act, 29…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.