Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1940No. 9162PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board has filed a petition in this court to enforce an order issued by it in proceedings which it instituted against the respondent, the Sunshine Mining Company. Respondent is a Washington corporation with its home office at Yakima, Washington. It maintains its principal place of business at Kellogg, Idaho.
The complaint, as amended, in addition to jurisdictional allegations, alleges the following material matters: that respondent had interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of their rights guaranteed in Section…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. And Winn-Dixie Louisville, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cumberland Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Superior Engraving Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.