Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Huxley

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1984No. Civ. 65343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Consolidated appeals by the husband in a dissolution-of-marriage proceeding. One appeal is from the interlocutory judgment dividing the property and ordering the husband to contribute $12,500 towards his wife’s attorney’s fees. We affirm that judgment in part, and reverse it in part. The other appeal involves a subsequent order of the trial court directing the husband to contribute $7,500 towards his wife’s attorney’s fees and costs on appeal. That order is affirmed.

Facts:

Karin Hansen and John (Jack) Huxley started living together in Los Angeles in June 1969. Jack transferred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Miller v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. In Re Marriage of CuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Langdon v. LangdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BuolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. In Re Marriage of FabianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re the Marriage of NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Malmquist v. MalmquistNevada Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API