Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Neal

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1984No. AO23421PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that a residence owned by a putative spouse prior to marriage is her separate property, but is presumed to be the community property of the parties when, during the marriage, she places title to the property in joint tenancy with her spouse. This presumption cannot be rebutted by an oral agreement between the parties that the property is to remain her separate property. Thus, adding a spouse’s name in joint tenancy to title of premarital separate property causes it to become “property acquired by the parties during marriage in joint tenancy form” pursuant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of MarsdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Marriage of BuolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Marriage of FabianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Walrath v. WalrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. In Re Marriage of MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API