Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Buol

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1985No. S.F. 24823PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

May legislation requiring a writing to prove, upon dissolution of marriage, that property taken in joint tenancy form is the separate property of one spouse constitutionally be applied to cases pending before its effective date? We conclude that it may not. Applied retroactively, the statute impairs vested property rights without due process of law.

Esther and Robert Buol married in 1943 and separated in 1977. The Buols had three children together and Esther had one child from a previous marriage.

Robert worked as a laborer until 1970 when he was fired, at least in part, due…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API