Legal Opinion

Kirchoff v. Cummard

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1924No. Civil No. 2160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

— This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. Appellant, defendant below, signed a listing contract by which he employed appellee to procure a purchaser for 80 acres of land situated in Maricopa county, this state, for a consideration of $48,000 to be paid upon the following terms: $14,000 cash, and the balance at $5,000 per year, deferred payments to bear 8 per cent interest. The contract was dated January 5, 1920, and provided for the payment of a commission of 5 per cent of selling price.

Some time thereafter appellee found and offered as purchasers Reaves A. Bird and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvord v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Klueter v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Frank v. Butte & Boulder Mining & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. De Vitt v. Kaufman CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Edwards v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Watson Construction Co. v. Reppel Steel & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Campisano v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Colmenero Canal Company v. BabersArizona Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API