Colmenero Canal Company v. Babers
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
J. C. Kimmel and his wife in March, 1951, entered into a contract with the Colmenero ■Canal Company wherein they sold to the ■company an irrigation well and pump. The Kimmels sued the canal company seeking to cancel the agreement. The company counterclaimed seeking judgment requiring specific performance of the contract. This litigation resulted in a decree requiring that the contract be specifically performed. Thereafter, the Kimmels sold their property and interest in the contract to Ben Babers. The litigation that gave birth to this appeal was initiated by Babers against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Gary's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Coe v. WinchesterArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Crone v. AmadoArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Kirchoff v. CummardArizona Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- LeBaron v. CrismonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Wheatland Irrigation District v. Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Suttle v. SeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Golder v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Kier v. CondrackUtah Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.