Edwards v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action was based upon three certain promissory notes, each for the sum of $266.66, dated Modesto, September 27, 1910, payable, respectively, on the fifth days of April of 1913, 1914, and 1915, executed by defendant and payable to the order of plaintiffs.
It is deemed proper first to explain that the notes sued on were given by Baker to the plaintiffs as the result of the compromise of a suit brought against the latter by the former, upon a quantum meruit, for the reasonable value of services performed by the plaintiffs in negotiating the sale of certain lands for the defendant to one P.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindley v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Boysen v. FrinkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Inge v. McCreeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Inge v. McCreeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Watson v. OdellUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Kirchoff v. CummardArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Kline v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953
- Mitchell v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.