Legal Opinion

Brammer v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 3, 1992No. 91-476PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLDAWAY, Associate Judge:

Appellant, James W. Brammer, appeals a September 13, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision which denied reopening his claim for entitlement to service connection for spinal meningitis. The BVA also determined appellant was not entitled to service connection for any residuals of frozen feet. The Court affirms the decision of the BVA.

BACKGROUND

Appellant is a combat veteran of World War II, who served from November 1942, to December 1944, in Normandy, Northern France, the Ardennes, the Rhineland, and Central Europe. On May 27, 1980, appellant submitted a claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  2. Rabideau v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  3. Smith v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  2. Fenderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  3. Francisco v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. Charles L. Degmetich, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Velez v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API