Burks v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Presiding Judge:
Samuel Rayfael Burks and Sam J. Agee have appealed their convictions in the District Court, Washington County, of Robbery With Firearms. Although they were tried together, they were represented by separate counsel and have brought separate appeals. We have consolidated their appeals for the sake of convenience and judicial economy. At the trial, the State presented extensive testimony and evidence concerning a burglary and the larceny of an automobile committed the day after the robbery. Both appellants argue that it was error to introduce the commission of…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by320 opinions
- United States v. Graham Lee KendallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Bruner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Hale v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hung Thanh Le v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.