Legal Opinion

James v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1938No. Criminal No. 869PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Harold James and Julio Guano were convicted of the crime of robbery, and duly sentenced therefor, whereupon this appeal was taken.

James has since died, and the appeal is prosecuted on behalf of Guano alone. There are seventeen assignments of error, which we will consider in accordance with the legal questions raised thereby, rather than numerically.

The charging part of the information reads as follows :

“That at the County of Yavapai, State of Arizona, on or about the 28th day of March, A. D. 1938, and prior to the filing of this information, the said Harold James and Julio Guano, did then and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ViceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Greve v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Stewart v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. OwenIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. George P. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. State v. CastanedaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API