Legal Opinion
Hughs v. Valley State Bank
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided December 10, 1999No. 80,840PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wahl, J.:
Valley State Bank (VSB), Tim Kohart, and Kevin White, defendants, appeal from the district court decision dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Brook Hughs’ retaliation action against them under the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (KAAD), K.S.A. 44-1001 et seq. The Kansas Human Rights Commission (KHRC) has filed a brief as amicus curiae.
Plaintiff Brook Hughs was employed by defendant VSB between 1981 and 1994. In early 1994, Hughs filed a complaint with the KHRC, alleging sex discrimination by her supervisor, defendant Kevin White. Because the complaint was untimely under state…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riedmiller v. HarnessCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Lawyer v. Eck & Eck MacH. Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Nixon v. Muehlberger Concrete Construction Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Snyder v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Swartzel v. Johnson County Community CollegeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022