Lawyer v. Eck & Eck MacH. Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
BROWN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Viola Mae Lawyer brought this action against her former employer, Eck & Eck Machine Company, claiming she was sexually harassed and discriminated against on account of pregnancy during her tenure with the company, in violation of federal employment discrimination law. Plaintiff also asserts several state law claims, including retaliation, negligent hiring, supervision and retention, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The matter is now before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The court finds oral…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grazioli v. Genuine Parts Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Clay v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Ammon v. Baron Automotive GroupDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Bedenfield v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020