Legal Opinion
Mackey v. IBP, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 7, 1996No. 95-2288-GTVPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Under consideration is Plaintiff’s Motion To Compel (doc. 34). Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 37, plaintiff Reba Ann Mackey thereby seeks an order to compel defendant IBP, Inc. (IBP) to answer Interrogatories 7, 12, 16, 17, and 20 and respond to Requests For Production 4 through 10. IBP opposes the motion.
This is an action for retaliatory discharge for the anticipated exercise of rights by plaintiff under the Kansas Workers’ Compensation Act, K.S A 44-501 to 5,125. (See Pretrial Order, doc. 40, ¶ 3.) Plaintiff began working for IBP on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Johnson v. GmeinderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.