Legal Opinion
Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1990No. 86-2156PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Frank Spulak sued K Mart Corporation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1982), alleging that he was constructively discharged from his employment with K Mart as a result of illegal age discrimination. He also asserted a pendent state claim for age discrimination and for extreme and outrageous conduct. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Spulak on the ADEA claim and awarded him back pay and liquidated damages. The court ruled post-trial that Spulak was entitled to front pay in lieu of reinstatement. The jury resolved the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Alvin Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation, Engine Division, and Andre J. Lambert, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.