Bettencourt v. Sheehy
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action by plaintiff, who conducts a grocery and merchandise store in Watsonville, against defendant, to recover the balance due on a running account for goods sold to him for one Kitagawa. There was found to he due plaintiff on this account the sum of $323.10, which included items aggregating $54.30 for wines and whisky sold to defendant for Kitigawa. None of said wine or whisky was .sold to be drunk on the store premises, and none of it was ■drunk there. It was sold in amounts of gallons and half gallons, being drawn from barrels into demijohns, and was all taken away from the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Barnes v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Keyes v. CyrusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Beiser v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Motorola, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Kahrs v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.