Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 8, 1984No. Appeal 83-834PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KASHIWA, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Claims Court, 1 Cl.Ct. 131 (No. 38-79), entered February 4,1983. The judgment is on the accounting phase of a similarly-captioned case (Motorola, Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 482 (1981), affirming and adopting Motorola, Inc. v. United States, 209 USPQ 769 (Ct.Cl.Tr.Div.1980)) that decided appellee’s liability. In a published opinion, 1 Cl.Ct. 131, the Claims Court, in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment, held that 35 U.S.C. § 287 is incorporated within 28 U.S.C. § 1498 and thereby bars appellant’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Belknap v. SchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Jerome H. Lemelson v. The United States, the Bendix Corporation and Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Susan M. Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., and Prange Way, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.