Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Harry I. Garson Productions

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922No. Docket No. 109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff sued upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant corporation and indorsed by the individual defendants. A verdict was *89directed against the defendants except Martha L. Garson, and directed in her favor. Plaintiff reviews the judgment as to her by writ of error.

The plaintiff introduced the notes sued on and rested. Counsel for Martha L. Garson then offered in evidence a deposition of her husband, Harry I. Garson, taken in California. In it he testified that he and Martha L. Garson were married on January 25, 1904, and that they have since that time been husband and wife.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russel v. People's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Talbot v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hubbell v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Detroit Chamber of Commerce v. GoodmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Caldwell v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koengeter v. HolzbaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Monroe State Savings Bank v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kirby v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Boehmer v. HerlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Monroe State Savings Bank v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API