Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Jones

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Corbett, J. Assumpsit by Robert Caldwell and William Loudon against Elnora Jones and E. S. Jones upon a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant Elnora Jones on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action on a promissory note of $100, payable to E. F. Ferris or order, and signed by the two defendants, who are husband and wife. The *130evidence offered on the trial by the plaintiffs tends to show that the note was given for a horse sold by Ferris to the defendants jointly, and the question is whether a married woman can make herself liable upon a note given jointly with her husband for the purchase of personal property by the two. The circuit judge directed a verdict in favor of Mrs. Jones.

It is clear that the effect of this undertaking of Mrs, Jones was to make herself liable as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Artman v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Speier v. OpferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Russel v. People's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Bassett v. ShepardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Curtis v. CroweMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doane v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Monroe State Savings Bank v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fitzgerald v. Harry I. Garson ProductionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API