Legal Opinion
Koengeter v. Holzbaugh
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1952No. Docket 67, Calendar 45,160PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Facts material to decision are stipulated to be as follows:
“A promissory note dated April 18,1946, was made and delivered by Dorothy K. Holzbaugh and Fred Holzbaugh to order of Henry Feldkamp or Laura Koengeter. The comakers were husband and wife •on that date. The sum of $10,000 was received for the said note. * * * In making the loan, the makers told the holders of the note that the loan was for the purpose of providing working capital for the Holzbaugh Machinery Sales, Inc. and the money was used for this purpose.
“Dorothy Holzbaugh was the sole stockholder of this Michigan corporation.”
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Montgomery v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Russel v. People's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Kenton Insurance v. McClellanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Kies v. WalworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Menard v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ben T. Lowell and Louise D. Lowell, Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- City Finance Co. v. KloostraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Detroit Newspaper Industrial Credit Union v. McDonaldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Nat'l Bank of Rochester v. Meadowbrook Hgts., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.