Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Grant

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw. Judgment creditors’ bills. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

These cases being in substance alike, were heard as one case, and will thus be disposed of.

A question was raised on the argument which will first be considered, and which may obviate any examination upon the merits. The bill calls for an answer upon oath. Charles W. Grant, Electa Grant his wife, and Mary C. Yawkey severally answer under oath, and each deny any and'all fraud in the transfers of the property sought to be reached.

Electa Grant admits in her answer that certain transfers of property were made and that she acquired the title to certain property thereunder and thereby. She sets…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Briggs, Oyer and Terminer, Albany County1880
  2. Pooley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. McGrathOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Benson v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API