Russel v. People's Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit upon a promissory note against'the Hamtramck Iron Works as principal and Anna E. Russel as indorser. Mrs. Russel brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The suit against Mrs. Russel in the court below was upon a contract of indorsement. It appears that the Detroit Car Works, a corporation in which she was a stockholder, was indebted to the Savings Bank upon a note which was about to be sued, and that to *673prevent suit she indorsed over to the bank a note held by herself against the Hamtramck Iron Works. This last note does not appear to have been received in exchange for the other, though the note against the Car Works was surrendered; but it was held by the bank as collateral security, and as it exceeded the other note in amount, there would…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West v. LarawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Campbell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Tillman v. ShackletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- De Vries v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Powers v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Speier v. OpferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Kenton Insurance v. McClellanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Doane v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Howe v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Edwards v. McEnhillMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.