Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
General Mills, Inc. appeals the trial court’s ruling that the ticket purchase agreement it entered into with the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission continues in effect following the repeal of Minn. Stat. § 473.568 (1982). General Mills asserts that the existence of section 473.568 was a condition precedent for its obligations to arise and that the contract’s repeal provision could not grant the legislature sole power to bind it, a private entity, to remain a party to the contract. General Mills also asserts that the repeal of section 473.568 frustrated the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991