State v. Mendoza-Solorio
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Fernando Mendoza-Solorio, convicted of one count of delivery of a controlled substance and one count of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, appeals, alleging first, the charging document failed to allege an essential element of conspiracy to deliver, and second, improper vouching by a State’s witness. The State concedes the charging error, but uniquely asks to supplement the record to cure the defect. We decline to establish a rule permitting supplementation at this stage. We decide any vouching was harmless under these facts. Accordingly, we reverse the conspiracy conviction…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Mendoza-SolorioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.