Legal Opinion

State v. Mendoza-Solorio

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 25, 2001No. 18999-6-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Fernando Mendoza-Solorio, convicted of one count of delivery of a controlled substance and one count of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, appeals, alleging first, the charging document failed to allege an essential element of conspiracy to deliver, and second, improper vouching by a State’s witness. The State concedes the charging error, but uniquely asks to supplement the record to cure the defect. We decline to establish a rule permitting supplementation at this stage. We decide any vouching was harmless under these facts. Accordingly, we reverse the conspiracy conviction…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Mendoza-SolorioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API