Legal Opinion

Miller Land & Mineral Co. v. State Highway Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1988No. 87-288PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granting appellees Robert L. Mitchell and Jane G. Mitchell title to the gravel in, on, or under the surface of their lands on the basis of the finding that gravel is not a mineral.

We affirm.

Appellant Miller Land & Mineral Company raises the following issues:

“A. Whether the District Court erred in holding that gravel was not included in the mineral reservation in the deed which is the subject of this action, which states:

‘Reserving unto Grantor, all mineral[s] and mineral rights existing under said above lands and premises or appurtenant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Moser v. United States Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Farr v. LinkWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MoncriefWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Murray v. BEJ Minerals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. McCormick v. Union Pacific Resources Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Thunder Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API