Legal Opinion

Thunder Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific Railroad

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-80PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellants Alexander Thunder Hawk, Jr., Alexander Thunder Hawk, Sr., and Iona Thunder Hawk appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of Appel-lee Union Pacific Railroad Company, from the order which denied Appellants’ motion for a new trial, and from the judgment entered against them for costs.

We affirm.

Issues

In their statement of the issues,- Appellants present five issues for our review:

Issue One: The court’s untimely hearings on pre-trial motions obscured the issues and distracted the court from the evidentiary matters which should have been presented to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. L.U. Sheep Co. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McCabe v. R.A. Manning Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Madison v. MarlattWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Turcq v. ShanahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lovato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Robinson v. HamblinWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Smyth v. KaufmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API