Legal Opinion

Moser v. United States Steel Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1984No. B-9735PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*100ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

CAMPBELL, Justice.

Our opinion of June 8, 1983, is withdrawn. The Motion for Rehearing is denied.

This is a suit to quiet title to an interest in uranium ore. We must determine whether uranium is included in a reservation or conveyance of “oil, gas and other minerals.” The trial court awarded title to the defendant mineral owners, and the court of appeals affirmed the trial court judgment. 601 S.W.2d 731. We affirm the judgments of the courts below, and hold that uranium is a part of the mineral estate.

The Mosers, plaintiffs,1 and the Gefferts, defendants,2 own…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Sawyer TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Benedict G. Wenske and Elizabeth Wenske v. Steve Ealy and Deborah EalyTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Purina Mills, Inc. v. Odell, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API