Legal Opinion

Nowak v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 22, 2006No. 06-11718PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING OUSACHI PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL (DKT. #40) AND DENYING NOWAK AND MCNEELY PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS (DKT. ## 9, 25)

PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a consolidated ERISA case brought by certain salaried and hourly Ford employ*357ees against Ford Motor Company and various fiduciaries of the Ford 401(k) plans. While not yet certified as a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3), counsel for the separate plaintiff groups are seeking to be named lead and liaison counsel under Rule 23(g). Although this currently is only a putative…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  3. In Re CMS Energy ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  4. In re Cardinal Health, Inc. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Organogenesis Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Outten v. Wilmington Trust Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  4. Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  5. Espejo v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API