Nowak v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING OUSACHI PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL (DKT. #40) AND DENYING NOWAK AND MCNEELY PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS (DKT. ## 9, 25)
PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a consolidated ERISA case brought by certain salaried and hourly Ford employ*357ees against Ford Motor Company and various fiduciaries of the Ford 401(k) plans. While not yet certified as a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3), counsel for the separate plaintiff groups are seeking to be named lead and liaison counsel under Rule 23(g). Although this currently is only a putative…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- In Re CMS Energy ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- In re Cardinal Health, Inc. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Organogenesis Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Outten v. Wilmington Trust Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Espejo v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.