Legal Opinion

In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 11, 2007No. 21MC92(SAS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

This Order addresses two motions. First, various individuals (“Movants”) move to intervene as plaintiffs in certain of the coordinated actions in the above-captioned litigation for the sole purpose of seeking to remove Milberg Weiss & Ber-shad LLP (“Milberg Weiss”), as well as other members of the IPO Executive Committee, as Lead Counsel in this litigation (the “motion to intervene”). Second, Mil-berg Weiss moves for a protective order barring Theodore A. Bechtold, Esq. (“Bechtold”), counsel for Movants, from issuing any class-wide communications…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Flag Telecom Holdings, Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Urtubia v. B.A. Victory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Hinds County, Miss. v. Wachovia Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API