Legal Opinion

Davies v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 26, 1912No. 768PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26465 (T: D. 31845).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The merchandise consists of a series of miniature paper articles of various kinds, such as paper spectacles, trick cards and pictures, paper dominoes, etc. They are small, flimsy, imperfect, and nonen-*111durable. Excepting the spectacles, they have printed thereupon designations of their imitated use. .They were reported by the appraiser as "miniature paper toys of various kinds.” They were returned by the collector as reported by the appraiser, and assessed for duty at the rate of 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 431 of the tariff act of 1909 as “toys.” The importer, appellant here, makes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Poynter Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. United States v. Frank P. Dow Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. United States v. IllfelderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API