Legal Opinion

United States v. Wanamaker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1927No. 2967PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

- Merchandise, invoiced as steam engines, was classified by the collector of customs at Philadelphia as mechanical toys under that part of paragraph 1414 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:

1414. Dolls * * * and all other toys and parts of toys * * * not specially provided for, 70 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested that the goods were steam engines and that they were dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph *311372 or at 40 per centum ad valorem as articles of metal under paragraph 399. The parts of paragraphs 372 and 399 of the act of 1922 upon which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davies v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Borgfeldt v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. International Models, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Shackman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. International Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API