Legal Opinion

United States v. Illfelder

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 28, 1929No. 3230Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Certain small machines, invoiced at from $2.80 to $9 a dozen, described by a member of the importing firm as moving-picture machines, were imported at the port of New York. These were classified by the collector as toys, under paragraph 1414 of the Tariff Act of 1922, and were claimed by the importer to be dutiable under paragraph 228 of said act. There were other claims made in the protest, but these were neither urged here nor in the court below. The Customs Court sustained the protests under said paragraph 228, and the Government has appealed.

The competing paragraphs are as follows:

Par.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API