Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank P. Dow Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 19, 1930No. 3244Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Appellee imported certain articles at the port of Seattle, Wash. These were classified by the collector as toys under paragraph 1414 •of the Tariff Act of 1922. The collector, in reporting the same, after protest, gave the following description of the articles:

Paper water flowers: These flowers, according to the report of the examining ■officer, were composed principally of compressed pith with tissue paper, which when placed in water expands into a crude semblance of a flower; classified at 70 per cent, paragraph 1414 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

REASONS AND AUTHORITY FOR ACTION

The article as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Davies v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API