Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Priest

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

delivered.the opinion of the Court.

The bill was filed by Guy Joyner, Sheriff, W. T. Mc-Lane, District Attorney, and Thomas Welford, foreman of the grand jury, public officials of Shelby County, W. Percy McDonald, a State official, Clarence Bowe, W. W. Fisher,- E. A. Powell and Sam House, citizens and taxpayers-of Shelby County. The object of the bill was'to test the constitutionality of Chapter 13, Public Acts Third Extra Session of 1937, which created a Crime Commission; and if the Act is found valid the complainants ask for a judgment declaratory of their rights, duties and obligations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Marshall CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Rushing v. Tennessee Crime CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Village of Deming v. Hosdreg CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stewart v. StanleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Holly v. City of ElizabethtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. McConnell v. City of LebanonTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API