Legal Opinion

Holly v. City of Elizabethton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1951PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

Acting under the authority supposed to be given by Chapter 137 of the Public Acts of 1951, the defendant municipality of Elizabethton authorized the issuance of $4,000,000 of “Industrial Building Revenue Bonds” for the purchase of a site and the erection thereon of an “industrial building” for lease to defendant corporation, Textron, Inc., to be used by Textron, Inc., for manufacturing, industrial and commercial purposes.

Complainant, by this suit instituted in accordance with the requirements of the Declaratory Judgment Law, Code, Section 8835 et seq., asserted and insisted that this statute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Poole v. City of KankakeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  4. Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. DAVIDSON COUNTY v. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Beck v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. County Court of Marion County v. DemusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API