Legal Opinion

Brill's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1940No. Appeal, 55PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to allow a claim presented by appellant at the audit of the account of the executrix of J. Edward Brill who died on January 10, 1936, leaving a will, executed in 1922, in which he gave his entire estate to his widow, whom he also named executrix.

In 1909 or 1910, although then married to Edith C. Brill, his widow, Brill went through the form of a marriage ceremony with the appellant Mary B. Betz, then Mary B. Seabrooke, using the name of Dawson. Thereafter, in 1911, a child, allegedly the son of the decedent,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brill v. BrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Flaccus v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Rapp v. RappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Cady v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API