Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Dunn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 2000PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, J.:

¶ 1 This appeal is from an Order filed August 14, 1998, sustaining Appellees, Weiehert Realtors, Robert M. Cuevas and Mary M. Cuevas’ preliminary objections to Appellants, Carl Kramer and his wife, Patricia Kramer’s amended complaint and from an Order dated April 5, 1999, granting summary judgment in favor of Appel-lees, Jack Dunn, t/a Remax Associates and Janet Finn.

¶ 2 Appellants claim the trial court erred in granting summary judgment after the case was called for trial, that the trial court erred or abused its discretion in determining when the applicable statute of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lerner v. LernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. DiGregorio v. Keystone Health Plan EastSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Heritage Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. v. National Penn BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Jahanshahi v. Centura Development Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Weik v. Estate of BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API