Legal Opinion

Beverage Marketing Corp. v. Ogilvy & Mather Direct Response, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 18, 1983No. 80 Civ. 3318 (RWS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Beverage Marketing Corporation (“Marketing”) has sued defendant Ogilvy & Mather Direct Response, Inc. (“Ogilvy”) claiming breach of contract and malpractice allegedly committed during the performance of an agreement for direct mail marketing services. Marketing has now moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(A)(ii) for an order compelling Ogilvy to produce a report prepared by one of Ogilvy’s experts. The motion is granted.

Discovery of expert materials is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4), which reads, in relevant part:(4) Trial Preparation: Experts.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  3. Quadrini v. Sikorsky Aircraft DivisionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  4. Fauteck v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Yeda Research & Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API