Fauteck v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DECKER, District Judge.
This is a class action alleging that the employment practices of defendant Montgomery Ward & Company violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiffs are four female past and present employees of Montgomery Ward’s Merchandising Group in Chicago, and represent a class of similarly situated employees. Plaintiffs have presented the court with two motions: a motion to authorize written communication with class members to solicit financial *395contributions for the maintenance of this action, and a motion to compel the production of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,029 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Pearl Brewing Co. v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crowe Countryside Realty Associates, Co. v. Novare Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Beverage Marketing Corp. v. Ogilvy & Mather Direct Response, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Bills v. Kennecott Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Hines v. WidnallDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.