Legal Opinion

Quadrini v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 20, 1977No. Civ. No. B-74-81PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF EXPERTS’ REPORTS

NEWMAN, District Judge.

In this highly technical lawsuit involving a helicopter crash, both sides intend to rely extensively on expert testimony at trial. Previous discovery requests relating to experts have already been ruled upon, and pursuant to the Court’s ruling the defendant will have the opportunity to take the depositions of certain of the plaintiffs’ experts. In anticipation of those depositions, and with an eye toward effective cross-examination of the experts at the depositions and ultimately at trial, defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breedlove v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1972
  2. Wilson v. ResnickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Herbst v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  5. American Bldgs. Co. v. Kokomo Grain Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API