Quadrini v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF EXPERTS’ REPORTS
NEWMAN, District Judge.
In this highly technical lawsuit involving a helicopter crash, both sides intend to rely extensively on expert testimony at trial. Previous discovery requests relating to experts have already been ruled upon, and pursuant to the Court’s ruling the defendant will have the opportunity to take the depositions of certain of the plaintiffs’ experts. In anticipation of those depositions, and with an eye toward effective cross-examination of the experts at the depositions and ultimately at trial, defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Breedlove v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1972
- Wilson v. ResnickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Herbst v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
3Cited by24 opinions
- B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- American Bldgs. Co. v. Kokomo Grain Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.