Legal Opinion

ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 16, 1977No. MDL No. 163-RM, and Nos. C-73-2238 SC and C-73-2239 SCPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTI, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on IBM’s motion for production of documents from Memorex’s expert witnesses. IBM asserts that it needs these documents to fairly prepare for cross-examination, and to fairly evaluate Memorex’s revised damage claims. Memorex interposes numerous objections in its opposition, but these boil down to its concern over the breadth of the IBM requests.

In an effort to deal with the problem of expert discovery, subsection (4) was added to Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1970. It provides:

Discovery of facts known and opinions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quadrini v. Sikorsky Aircraft DivisionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  2. Breedlove v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1972
  3. Wilson v. ResnickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Harry E. Hoover v. The United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Syken v. ElkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Boring v. KellerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  5. American Bldgs. Co. v. Kokomo Grain Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API