Legal Opinion
Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 13, 2006No. C 04-1486 CW, C 04-4696 CWPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS
WILKEN, District Judge.
Defendants Teledigital, Inc., and Teledigital Development, Inc. (collectively, Teledigital) and Defendants Phonetec LP and Phonetec PCS, LLC (collectively, Phonetec) separately move for a stay of proceedings in Plaintiff Telemac Corporation’s related lawsuits against them pending reexamination of Telemac’s patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). Telemac opposes the motions. The matters were taken under submission on the papers. Having considered all of the papers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Xerox Corp. v. 3Com Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Ascii Corp. v. Std Entertainment USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Cygnus Telecommunications Technology, LLC v. United World Telecom, L.C.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- At & T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I v. TiVo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Akzenta Paneele + Profile GmbH v. Unilin Flooring N.C. LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Equipements De Trasformation IMAC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.