Legal Opinion
Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 7, 1985No. Appeal 84-699PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are Patlex Corporation and Gordon Gould. Appellees are Gerald J. Mossinghoff in his capacity as Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks; the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and intervenor Control Laser Corporation.
The issue is whether certain provisions of the patent reexamination statute and implementing regulations are in violation of: the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution; 1 the jury trial guarantee of the Seventh Amendment; 2 Article III which vests judicial power in the courts of the United States; or the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.