Legal Opinion
Akzenta Paneele + Profile GmbH v. Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 12, 2006No. Civil WDQ-05-3445PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
QUARLES, District Judge.
Akzenta Paneele + Profile GmbH (“Akzenta”) has filed suit against Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC, Unilin Beheer B.V., Columbia Flooring, BHK of America, Roe-sel-Heck Co., Inc., and CMH Flooring Products (collectively “Unilin”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,804,926 (the “ '926 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,065,935 (the “'935 patent”).
Pending are Akzenta’s motions to stay the litigation pending reexamination of the patents by the United States Patent Office (the “PTO”) and to strike portions of Uni-lin’s answer to Akzenta’s amended complaint. For the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Joseph R. Armstrong, Sr. v. The Frostie Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Cygnus Telecommunications Technology, LLC v. United World Telecom, L.C.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Elite Entertainment, Inc. v. Khela Bros. EntertainmentDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Tomco2 Equipment Co. v. Southeastern Agri-Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- In re Webyention LLC '294 Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Boudieu v. CoxDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
- Evans v. HurtadoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.