Legal Opinion
At & T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I v. TiVo, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 1, 2011No. Case C 10-01059 SBAPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PENDING REEXAMINATION
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendant asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,809,492 (the “'492 Patent”), 5,922,045 (the “'045 Patent”), 6,118,976 (the “'976 Patent”) and 6,983,478 (the “'478 Patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”). The parties are presently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination. Dkt. 63. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Amado v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Cooper Technologies Co. v. DudasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Berkeley Lights, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Anderson Power Products, Inc. v. Bizlink Technology, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Apple Inc. v. Alivecor, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.