Legal Opinion

United States v. Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided July 8, 2009No. 92-2062PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING INTERVENOR PEOPLE FIRST’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS STATE OF TENNESSEE ET AL.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court are Intervenor People First of Tennessee’s (“People First”) motion for partial summary judgment (D.E. # 2400) and Defendants State of Tennessee et al’s (“Defendants” or “State”) motion for summary judgment (D.E. # 2404). On Thursday, July 2, 2009, the Court entered a summary order GRANTING People First’s motion and DENYING Defendants’ motion. This order hereby sets forth the reasons for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Carol A. Jacklyn Roger Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramco-Remodel America Corp. v. Wallis (In re Ramco-Remodel America Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
  2. Nat'l Elec. Annuity Plan v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API