United States v. Tennessee
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING INTERVENOR PEOPLE FIRST’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS STATE OF TENNESSEE ET AL.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court are Intervenor People First of Tennessee’s (“People First”) motion for partial summary judgment (D.E. # 2400) and Defendants State of Tennessee et al’s (“Defendants” or “State”) motion for summary judgment (D.E. # 2404). On Thursday, July 2, 2009, the Court entered a summary order GRANTING People First’s motion and DENYING Defendants’ motion. This order hereby sets forth the reasons for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Carol A. Jacklyn Roger Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramco-Remodel America Corp. v. Wallis (In re Ramco-Remodel America Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Nat'l Elec. Annuity Plan v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021