Legal Opinion
Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Blatter
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1999No. 95-1837PublishedCited by 2,608 opinions
1Per curiam
The en banc court is divided in this case, but not equally. Eight members of the court favor a decision to affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand in accordance with the opinion written by Judge Moore. There are three separate opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part from Judge Moore’s opinion, which the eight other members of the court join in varying combinations.1
Judge Kennedy (joined by Judges Boggs, Suhrheinrich, and Batchelder) dissents from Part III.A.4. of Judge Moore’s opinion, insofar as it concludes that defendants Graham, Bildner, and Blatter are potentially liable to…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,608 opinions
- Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Shehee v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Randy Berkshire v. Debra DahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Wayne LaFountain v. Shirlee HarryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Anthony Martin v. Susan DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
2,603 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.