Legal Opinion

Nat'l Elec. Annuity Plan v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 16, 2021No. 20-1024Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 21a0091n.06 No. 20-1024 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Feb 16, 2021 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ANNUITY PLAN, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN ) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN HENKELS & MCCOY, INC., ) ) Defendant-Appellee. ) BEFORE: BOGGS, DONALD, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges. BOGGS, Circuit Judge. The National Electrical Annuity Plan (“NEAP”) seeks contribu- tions that it alleges Henkels & McCoy, Inc. (“H & M”) owes NEAP for work performed by H & M’s…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API