Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, holding claims 1-4, 7, 10, 12, 14-22 and 24-27 of United States Patent No. 3,537,146 (‘146 patent), claims 1, 10 and 12 of United States Patent No. 3,660,869 (‘869 patent), and claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 17, and 21 of United States Patent No. 3,965,538 (‘538 patent) invalid on the ground of obviousness, and the same claims of the ‘538 patent invalid on the ground of double patenting. We reverse.
Background(1) The Art
One-piece cable ties are used to bind a bundle…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.